codingprolab@gmail.com

- Home
- Uncategorized
- CSE 417 Algorithms & Computational Complexity Assignment #6 (rev. a)

$30.00

Category: Uncategorized

Description

5/5 - (4 votes)

1. [10 points] Consider the instance of the Weighted Interval Scheduling Problem (KT 6.1, p 252) given in the

following table and sketched in the figure.

Index Start Finish Value

j sj fj vj

1 1 4 25

2 2 5 20

3 3 6 31

4 3 7 40

5 4 8 35

6 6 9 28

v1 = 25

v2 = 20

v3 = 31

v4 = 40

Time: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Index

1

2

3

4

5

6

v5 = 35

v6 = 28

Build a table like that shown on slide 19 of my “DP-Scheduling” slides to illustrate the execution of the dynamic

programming algorithm for solving this problem (“Iterative-Compute-Opt”, KT 6.2, p259 or my slide 17; not the

“recursive” or “memoized” versions given earlier in the book/slides). Your table should should repeat j, sj , fj ,

and vj from above and show, for each 1 ≤ j ≤ 6

(a) The value of p(j), (cf. p 253, slide 10) for this problem instance, as well as

(b) The “max” expression and resulting Opt[j] values (slide 19).

In addition:

(c) Find the optimal solution (not just its value) by running the “traceback” algorithm (p 257–8 or slide 20)

(d) Decorate your table with arrows to illustrate the traceback as in my slides 22–3 (new 2/21; re-download if

you have saved older versions).

(e) Assume we change the problem so that v6 = 30. Explain how, if at all, the table would change, how the

Opt value would change, and how the solution and traceback would change.

(f) Extra Credit: Consider the greedy algorithm “process jobs in order of increasing finish time; keep each

if it is consistent with previous choices.” Generalize this example to show that this greedy algorithm not

only may get a suboptimal value, it also may choose many jobs that are not part of any optimal solution.

2. [10 points] Show the OPT table (Figures 6.11, 6.12) that would be produced by the Subset Sum algorithm (KT,

Section 6.4, pp 266-271) when run on the sequence of weights w1 = 5, w2 = 2, w3 = 4, w4 = 3, and w5 = 6,

with bound W = 16. What is the optimum solution found (both its total value and the selected weights)?

Summarize the traceback (e.g., in part by overlaying a few arrows on the table) that establishes this optimum

solution.

3. [20 points] Here’s a variant of the knapsack problem: You are given a knapsack of capacity W, and an unlimited

supply of each of n kinds of item, where the i-th kind of item has integer weight wi > 0 and value vi >

0, 1 ≤ i ≤ n. Give an O(nW) time algorithm to find how many of each item to carry so as to maximize value

without exceeding capacity. I.e., find non-negative integers mi

, 1 ≤ i ≤ n, maximizing P

1≤i≤n mivi subject

to P

1≤i≤n miwi ≤ W. (Note that the best solution might not completely fill the knapsack.)

4. [20 points] KT Chapter 6, problem 1, page 312. (.jpg image) Note that for this problem, the question is to find

the optimal solution, not just its cost (i.e., include “trace-back”). Also, as always, “give an algorithm” means

algorithm, correctness argument and run time analysis.

1

5. [20 points] KT Chapter 6, problem 2, page 313. (.jpg image)

6. Extra Credit: KT Chapter 6, problem 6, page 317. (.jpg image) Assume no word is longer than L. [Side note:

this algorithm, invented by Knuth, is a core feature of TEX/LATEX.]

WhatsApp us