Description
2 Project Setup
Please complete the following:
1. For your seventh lab, all files must go into the Lab07 folder.
2. After you complete each task, commit and push your change to version control. In order to earn
full marks, you must commit and push after each function is complete. Your commit message must
be a short message to me that describes what you completed for this commit, i.e., “deconstructed
base_conversion”, or “debugged function_name”, etc.
3. Since I am already a collaborator I will pull your future work automatically.
3 Requirements
Please complete the following:
1. Implement the following functions. The name you must use is below. Do not modify the name I have
provided.
1
2. Include correctly formatted docstrings that include comprehensive doctests (where possible) for each
function. These docstrings must explain to the user how the function is meant to be used, and what
the expected output will be when input is provided.
3. Each function must also be tested in a separate unit test file by a separate collection of unit tests.
Ensure your test cases and functions have descriptive, meaningful names, and ensure that every
possible valid input is tested for each function.
4. Ensure that the docstring for each function you write has the following components (in this order):
(a) Short one-sentence description that begins with a verb in imperative tense
(b) One blank line
(c) Additional comments if the single line description is not sufficient (this is a good place to describe in detail how the function is meant to be used)
(d) PARAM statement for each parameter that describes what it should be, and what it is used for
(e) PRECONDITION statement for each precondition which the user promises to meet before using
the function
(f) POSTCONDITION statement for each postcondition which the function promises to meet if the
precondition is met
(g) RETURN statement that describes what the function returns
(h) One blank line
(i) And finally, the doctests. Here is an example:
def my_factorial(number):
“””Calculate factorial.
A simple function that demonstrates good comment construction.
PARAM: number, a positive integer
PRECONDITION: number must be a positive integer
POSTCONDITION: calculates the correct factorial
RETURN: correctly calculated factorial as an int
>>> my_factorial(0)
1
>>> my_factorial(1)
1
>>> my_factorial(5)
120
“””
return math.factorial(number)
5. Part C of the midterm consisted of six questions. I’d like to make sure you can answer these questions
correctly.
6. Create a new file called midterm.py.
7. Inside midterm.py, implement correct, efficient solutions to all six of the midterm coding questions.
8. Your solutions must include docstrings. Add doctests if necessary that demonstrate the correct
use of the code to potential users.
9. Of course we need to write some unit tests, too. (Of course). I’d like you to write a small suite of
unit tests for three of the functions, to wit: list_tagger, cutoff, and prepender:
(a) for list_tagger, test the following disjointed equivalency partitions:
i. empty list
2
ii. list of length 1
iii. a non-empty list that contains more than one item.
(b) for cutoff, test the following disjointed equivalency partitions:
i. [], 0 (empty list and zero)
ii. [], 5 (empty list and five)
iii. [0], 0 (list of length one containing a zero, and zero)
iv. [0], 5 (list of length one containing a zero, and five)
v. [2], 2 (list of length one containing a two, and two)
vi. [2], 4 (list of length one containing a two, and four)
vii. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], 0 (list of five positive numbers, and zero)
viii. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], 2 (list of five positive integers, and a number that divides evenly into some
of them)
ix. [2, 2, 2, 2, 2], 2 (list of five identical positive integers, and a number that divides evenly
into all of them)
x. [2, 2, 2, 2, 2], 10 (list of five identical positive integers, and a number that doesn’t divide
evenly into any of them)
xi. [3, 6, 9, 12, 15], 3 (list of five different integers, and a number that divides evenly into all
of them)
xii. Can you think of any other combinations of input that are unrelated to the ones I have
listed here?
(c) for prepender, test the following disjointed equivalency partitions:
i. [], “” (an empty list and a string that contains no characters)
ii. [], “Python” (an empty list and a string that contains some characters)
iii. [“Python”], “” (a list of length one and a string that contains no characters)
iv. [“Python”], “I love ” (a list of length one and a string that contains characters)
v. [“Python”, “is”, “better”, “than”, “JavaScript”], “” (a list of length greater than one, and an
empty string)
vi. [“Python”, “is”, “better”, “than”, “JavaScript”], “Umm… ” (a list of length greater than one,
and a non-empty string)
vii. Can you think of any other combinations of input that are unrelated to the ones I have
listed here?
10. That’s it. Not so hard, was it?
3
